| Content |
Below standard
Content is minimally completed, or is missing crucial elements (personal statement, curriculum development evidence, reflective teaching for student learning). The reviewer has significant questions regarding one or more sections of the portfolio. Connections between the content in each of the three sections (personal statement, curriculum development, reflective teaching for student learning) are missing or nonexistent. |
Meets standard
Content is adequately completed, containing all crucial elements (personal statement, curriculum development evidence, reflective teaching for student learning). The reviewer has no significant questions regarding any section. Connections between the content in each of the three sections are present, but could be elaborated on further to provide more specific examples of the student’s philosophy of education, pedagogical knowledge and/or reflective teaching practices. |
Exceeds standard
Content is completed in an extremely detailed manner, containing well-developed sections for all crucial elements (personal statement, curriculum development evidence, reflective teaching for student learning). The reviewer has no lingering questions regarding any section of the portfolio. Connections between the content in each of the three sections are readily apparent, and include significant examples of the student’s knowledge and practices. |
| Formatting |
Below standard
The portfolio appears incomplete or hastily compiled. The reader finds it difficult to navigate between the portfolio sections. |
Meets standard
The portfolio appears adequately put together. The reader finds it relatively easy to navigate between the portfolio sections. There is attention to detail in the appearance of most sections. With more time, however, the portfolio formatting could be improved for greater ease of reading. |
Exceeds standard
The portfolio is exceedingly well formatted, allowing the reader to seamlessly navigate between sections. The reader finds examples of student work and curricular design to be well displayed in a visually attractive manner. There is great attention to detail in the appearance of all portfolio sections and work samples. |
| Language mechanics & formatting |
Below standard
There are severe errors in language mechanics and sentence structure that severely impede review of the portfolio. Significant revisions are necessary before the portfolio is used in any employment situation. |
Meets standard
There are several noticeable errors in language mechanics and sentence structure that moderately impede review of the portfolio. Some small revisions are necessary before the portfolio is used in an employment situation. |
Exceeds standard
The portfolio provides extreme ease of reading for the reviewer, there are there are no errors in language mechanics and sentence structure to impede review of the portfolio. No revisions are needed for the portfolio to be used in an employment situation. |
juandon. Innovación y conocimiento 
Deja una respuesta